Who’s Watching The Wikimen, Or Wikipeople
I just found in a random search (for editing Wikipedia) an article by Wired about an effort to see who's editing the world's largest encyclopedia. I have some privacy reservations about this sort of third party monitoring, especially if corporations are turning the screws on people writing about their excesses. I guess though, if everyone can do it, everyone should. Of course, corporations are the sort of bodies that have people who can spare the time to do this sort of activity, which could lead to that sort of misuse. Now, I'm sure that's not happening, because corporations never behave badly. Right?
Contribute to the Wiki
Hi all lurkers, commenters, twitterers and other assorted folks. For my Searching The Internet course, I'd like to reinforce the public nature of wikis - so I'd like to get you to contribute a paragraph, topic, idea, tips or tricks to boost the openness of my student's wiki.
So, here's a link have at it!
Rubrics for Discussions and Wiki-Based Work
I've been refreshing a course I created in 2004 about Searching the Internet. Instead of the antiquated handouts I've replaced those four assignments with a wiki - each learner will contribute links, text, audio, images and video to the wiki. I decided that I can't let them go and work in it without giving them some expectations so I spent a couple hours drafting this wiki rubric. I also cut 10% out of the mark and added it to a discussion component to drive people to talk in the talk pages of the wiki and the Discussion tool in the LMS. Here's that discussion rubric.
The course I teach generally is to people who are older, may have a job during the day and are aspiring web designers. I would say that most of these people are carving out a second career. This course is taught at a distance, but I intend to tweak the rubric for a continuing education delivery (maybe take out the discussion element, or reduce it for a face to face class).
If you see some glaring errors I'd appreciate any feedback, in the comments or on twitter (@dietsociety), or something that I didn't consider in my language. Thanks.
Built In Crap Detector
Every man should have a built-in automatic crap detector operating inside him. It also should have a manual drill and a crank handle in case the machine breaks down.
Ernest Hemingway, in a 1954 interview with Robert Manning, appearing in the Atlantic Magazine, August 1965
Howard Rheingold had mentioned this quote a couple of times, and it really stuck with me. So much so, I had to look it up and I'll be using it in my teaching next fall. I teach a course called "Searching The Internet Effectively" and wanted to overhaul the content as it was mainly designed five years ago, with content refreshes every semester to reflect the fluid nature of the beast. I hadn't really approached the social side of the web - mainly because I was busy keeping up with changes. There were and are elements missing from the course.
I had realized last year that I hated the method of delivery, which consisted of me lecturing and the class doing squat until I was done talking. Part of the problem is that they're in rows in classrooms. I can't make things much better; the politics of furniture, or rather the politics of furniture in a computer lab restrict me.
The content, while adequate for the majority of students, is not as engaging as I'd like. I never seemed to get to the stuff where I really enjoyed, which was talking about discerning bullshit from good stuff on the web. So I've spent the last four months off and on collecting data and sites that will help inform learners. I think making content a "treasure hunt" of sorts can help with student engagement, and I'll still "lecture" but more as a method to ensure that learners who have no prior experience with web searching (which strikes me as odd) still participate and can contribute.
I'm planning on replacing the crappy assignments with wiki-work. If people outside the class contribute great, if not, I think it'll still be worthwhile. I'll still have a final exam as that's a mandatory item. I'll have one assignment which is a culmination of all the skills I hope students acquire. Remember this is only a six-week course, so it's not as lengthy as a "normal" course.
Which brings me to the point. Students are going to have a hard time with this - if this isn't done well. Debunking authority, whether it be subject authority or any other kind of authority, unsettles people and screws with people's expectations. But building this sort of crap detector in someone's life is a critical skill to have. It's amazing how many people are very trusting with content they get on the web and a bit frightening when you extrapolate it to how it can affect people in real life. Certainly the ability of unscrupulous hucksters to bilk someone of money is out there, hopefully skepticism prevails for people in my class.
I really appreciated this post, which begins to illuminate the new construction of authority in a distributed environment. Objectivity, trust, authority... all related and tied up. Hopefully none of this sets off any crap detectors.
Crap.
Hmm, I suppose I'll look back at this moment in a few months with a hearty guffaw, and muse "Oh Jon, there's such a simple solution." These are truly "first world problems" if I've ever heard them. Oh yeah, Barry Dahl's video is incredibly useful, except it doesn't actually show how he embeds the wiki in D2L - it basically shows you how to embed stuff in a wiki which is embedded in D2L. Close to what I need. Yes, I've e-mailed to see if Barry can help sort out my muddled mind, but venting never hurts.
EDIT: After a brief phone call, he's still baffled, I'm ready to tear my moustache out.
I've been trying to embed a MediaWiki in my proposed D2L version of my Searching The Internet Effectively course. I'd like to constrict the opening of this page to remain in the frameset that D2L exists in so students can pop back and forth between the content that's in the course, and the wiki to add their own content. Every method of embedding I've tried opens the wiki in a new page. I'm beginning to wonder if the damn thing is set to automatically open in a new page.... or maybe Firefox is overriding some weird thing. First of all framesets?? Give me a break. If framesets get deprecated anytime soon (as they should) D2L is in for a major redesign. Talk about a total head-scratcher.
Also, I hate IE. I thought when I got out of web design as a career that I could learn to like, accept, ok not hate IE. Wrong. IE is crap. IE 8 is OK passable, except that when you use the TinyMCE editor in D2L in an IE browser (IE 8 included), it strips out co-ordinates of an image map. And other attributes of the object tag. WTF??
A Question Posed…
I was thinking on the walk home last night about how I could change my Searching The Internet Effectively course so that it might have more impact. Currently it's a fairly straight forward deal - lecture for one hour, then give students class time to complete an exercise which I will help them with over the next two hours. Most students choose to leave after the lecture and complete the work at home, or another place. The last question on the last exercise asks students to factor in everything they know at this point, and search for something that is related to searching and outline this in a word document with evaluations of the websites they've found - sort of an annotated bibliography. Then there's an exam, which is mandatory.
This course is far too straight forward for my tastes. I think I'd like to keep the weekly worksheets as an exercise, but make the markable stuff in a wiki. I was thinking each student wiki account would also allow the student to journal their searching terms, perhaps on an account info page that the student would cut and paste search terms into so that I was sure of the technical aspect of searching was covered.
Anyone out there mark contributions to a wiki other than this one? How would such a beast exist? I'd break it down to deal with content (is it a good website?), form (how it was discovered), editing (did they revisit and revise content?)... Frankly I'm a pessimist, and what happens if the students reject this sort of (in my institution anyway) radical idea?
