Tags Used
21st century literacies
aesthetics
blechboard
blog
blogs
brock university
CCK08
CCK09
complexity
connecting
connections
Connectivism
crowd sourcing
D2L
design affecting knowledge
desire2learn
e-learning
ECI831
edupunk
facebook
Facilitation
george siemens
google
HTML 5
informal education
informal learning
internet usage
LMS
mcluhan
mediawiki
mobile computing
mobile learning
online learning
searching course
Searching the Internet
social media
twitter
usability requirements in e-learning
user experience
UX
web 2.0
web 2.0 tools
what if?
wiki
work
Administrate Meta-Phor
Twitter Feed
- OH: "When does Lent start?" "I dunno, I'm Jewish" 2 hours ago
- also, slightly peeved that dex4 is more common for Dexter related stuff not diabetic glucose (which are hard to get into) 2 hours ago
- I've never liked self promotion - I wonder if this will eventually hurt me. 3 hours ago
- wish the #cs101 weekly topics were better modularized - that way I could spread out the learning better. Designed to do it at once. 6 hours ago
- finished week 1 of the #udacity #cs101 course, good to brush up on programming logic - looking forward to next week. 6 hours ago
Blogroll
- A List Apart
- Bava Tuesdays / Jim Groom
- Clay Shirky's Internet Writings
- Connectivism
- Educational Technology.ca / Alec Couros
- Elearnspace / George Siemens
- Howard Rheingold
- Presentation Zen / Garr Reynolds
- The Ed Rush / Ed Webb
Comments Commentary
Commenting is apparently all the rage again. Well, whether or not turning off comments is an anti-democratic statement, or just a push to comment on one's own blog... that's the discussion really. Here's a good summary of how some folks handle comments, go there review the ideas and come back. OK, so I felt compelled to write a longer piece, but that's because I'm moved to. I suspect that most people who do not own a blog, or their own space, would not. They might however, consider leaving a comment. There two basic arguments for leaving comments on:
1. It's the whole idea behind what makes the Internet great. Communication. Two-way communication, in fact, not just a faucet of information that spits out words when you turn it on. Isn't the whole point of a blog to engage in an exchange of ideas? I typically don't respond to people who have comments turned off. I don't read D'arcy Norman's blog because it's a dead end. While he may be pushing out great ideas, and I'm sure he is, because he's written consistently good stuff. I don't bother with it. There is a clear statement (which is not intended, I'm sure) that my opinion doesn't matter. You see I like commenting on other's article in a way that's immediately reflected on that article/post. Most people won't bother clicking through trackbacks, nor searching for responses. They aren't that invested in it. Moreover, if you don't want to be bothered to curate your own blog posts why should I?
2. You create a walled garden of readers and feedback by turning comments off. Someone who stumbles on your site, who doesn't have their own Internet presence, might comment if you gave them a chance. In fact, it might be their only way to comment (besides e-mail, which seems more and more to be an imposition rather than a service). So why take it away from them? It's not taking away their voice, but it is taking away the opportunity. So why do it? I get that it feels more "yours", which is an argument that D'arcy Norman makes - however, the Internet is not your, mine or anyone's. It's ours. So if you want part of it for you, keep it to yourself. But don't expect someone else to write about it. I have an Internet presence, but I doubt I would've started had I been unable to see the exchange that goes on between Downes and the people he interacts with. It wasn't his writing that spurned me to action but the discussion around it.